Tim Delhaes, co-founder and CEO of multi-chain pockets Grindery, argued that Telegram’s exclusivity take care of TON Basis dangers alienating builders, which might make TON irrelevant.
The newly introduced exclusivity deal between the messaging app and TON Basis mandates that each one Telegram Mini Apps with crypto integrations via the TON community.
Though Telegram frames the transfer as a strategic alignment, it’s seen as an effort from the corporate behind the messaging app to tighten its management over the blockchain ecosystem.
Delhaes defined to CryptoSlate that the coverage shift features a strict 7- to 10-day migration window for builders. This timeframe is unusually brief for decentralized ecosystems, the place such transitions usually unfold over months.
Whereas Telegram has marketed itself as a champion of decentralization, Delhaes in contrast its newest actions to these of Apple, Google, and Meta, which have drawn criticism for working walled gardens that prohibit exterior competitors.
Delhaes said:
“Should you’re working in a considerably centralized setting, like web2 tech world, you’ll possible count on corporations to try this. However in the event you’re coming into the web3 house with an aspiration of constructing open supply methods and eliminating walled gardens, it is advisable to ask your self, who actually lives as much as what they’re publicly saying.”
He additional argued that the modifications in Telegram’s crypto Mini Apps influence the entire crypto business, creating uncertainty for builders constructing functions in varied blockchain ecosystems. Delhaes believes the transfer may jeopardize Telegram’s credibility relating to blockchain functions.
He famous that tasks corresponding to Hamster Fight and Notcoin amassed many customers however added that group and liquidity nonetheless reside on different networks.
Delhaes mentioned that by creating an exclusivity clause in its phrases of providers, TON dangers turning into irrelevant or turning into a community the place individuals solely use gimmicks regardless of presenting framework.
He added:
“Telegram needs TON to be the fee rails of an excellent app, however I believe this path [of irrelevance] is the place they’re going.”
TON Basis defends integration technique
The TON Basis mentioned that the shift will finally profit builders and customers. In a press release despatched to CryptoSlate, a spokesperson mentioned:
“By integrating TON because the unique blockchain for Telegram’s Mini App ecosystem, Telegram can now present a strong, dependable, and scalable resolution.”
When requested if the transfer may trigger a builder exodus, TON argued that the unified consumer expertise would streamline onboarding for crypto customers and builders.
The Basis additionally reiterated that sustaining developer engagement stays a high precedence, as they’re the principle drivers of ecosystem development. It added that the phrases of service modifications make pockets integration “a lot simpler,” resulting in larger conversion charges.
Moreover, the TON Basis said that the modifications align with its imaginative and prescient of an ecosystem centered on a seamless, scalable, and user-friendly setting for customers and builders.
The spokesperson mentioned:
“On the identical time, we’re centered on balancing enlargement with safety and reliability, leveraging TON’s inherent scalability to help world consumer development whereas repeatedly iterating on and bettering the infrastructure.”
Talked about on this article
