Supporters of BIP-110 view Bitcoin as a public utility whose scarce block area must be reserved primarily for financial settlement. Inscriptions and different data-heavy functions characterize consumption of a restricted useful resource that must be protected for monetary transactions, even when doing so requires introducing new consensus guidelines.
DOG Mode begins from the other premise.
Leonidas argued Bitcoin ought to stay a impartial market for block area, the place any legitimate transaction is equally authentic offered the sender pays the prevailing charge. From that perspective, there isn’t a goal distinction between a bitcoin fee and an Ordinals inscription.
Reasonably than searching for permission by a protocol improve, the intention for DOG Mode is to take away coverage restrictions that its supporters argue Bitcoin itself by no means required.
The proposal additionally raises a extra refined query about Bitcoin’s infrastructure.
If sufficient nodes start working completely different coverage software program, the community’s mempool — the gathering of unconfirmed transactions ready to be mined — might turn into more and more fragmented. Consensus would stay intact, however completely different components of the community might relay completely different transactions, affecting charge estimation and the way shortly some transactions attain miners.
That fragmentation already exists to a level, however DOG Mode might widen these variations by encouraging broader acceptance of transactions that many default nodes presently refuse to relay.
