Close Menu
StreamLineCrypto.comStreamLineCrypto.com
  • Home
  • Crypto News
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • NFT
  • Defi
  • Blockchain
  • Metaverse
  • Regulations
  • Trading
What's Hot

Bitcoin Price Retreats From Highs – Is The Market Signaling A Short-Term Top?

October 8, 2025

Why Ripple Won’t Be Just A Regular Bank – The Fed Master Account Application Is A Game-Changer

October 8, 2025

BNB ousts XRP after surge fueled by utility and memecoin trading

October 7, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Wednesday, October 8 2025
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
StreamLineCrypto.comStreamLineCrypto.com
  • Home
  • Crypto News
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • NFT
  • Defi
  • Blockchain
  • Metaverse
  • Regulations
  • Trading
StreamLineCrypto.comStreamLineCrypto.com

‘These Fiat Arguments Regarding OP_RETURN Need to Go’ — Jimmy Song

September 21, 2025Updated:September 21, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
‘These Fiat Arguments Regarding OP_RETURN Need to Go’ — Jimmy Song
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
ad


Jimmy Track, a Bitcoin (BTC) developer and advocate, slammed the choice by Bitcoin Core builders to take away the OP_Return restrict for non-monetary knowledge embedded on the Bitcoin blockchain within the upcoming Bitcoin Core 30 improve, calling it “fiat” mentality.

Track accused the Core builders of deflecting consumer issues about eradicating the OP_Return restrict, which is at present 80 bytes in dimension, and ignoring the numerous pushback from the Bitcoin group and node runners. He additionally stated:

“The concept spam is tough to outline, and due to this ambiguity, we should not be making any distinctions in any respect within the software program, is a time-wasting argument from fiat politics the place you faux to not know the apparent, so the precise debate can by no means get off the bottom — the non-monetary makes use of of Bitcoin are spam.

You possibly can argue whether or not that is one thing fascinating or not, however saying you may’t outline it’s a stalling tactic meant to keep away from the true argument about precise impression — notably, the long-term impression of this modification,” Track continued.

‘These Fiat Arguments Regarding OP_RETURN Need to Go’ — Jimmy Song
The pull request for eradicating the OP_Return restrict was extremely unpopular with the Bitcoin group, however was pushed via regardless. Supply: GitHub

The OP_Return debate has raged on for almost six months, and is paying homage to the Bitcoin block dimension wars that befell between 2015 and 2017, which finally resulted in a tough fork of the Bitcoin protocol that spawned Bitcoin Money (BCH), main some within the Bitcoin group to take a position if the OP_Return wars will lead to the same break up.

Associated: Taproot creators didn’t foresee its ‘trolling worth’ — Bitcoin dev

Node runners vote with their toes in historic exodus to Bitcoin Knots

The choice by Bitcoin Core devs to unilaterally blow open the OP_Return knowledge restrict has left the Bitcoin group divided and pushed report numbers of Bitcoin node runners to Bitcoin Knots, an alternate implementation of the Bitcoin node software program.

This surge in nodes working Bitcoin Knots, which now account for about 20% of the community, in comparison with about 1% in 2024, represents a near-vertical leap in simply 9 months.

Bitcoin Core, Decentralization, Bitcoin Block Size, Nodes, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Ordinals
A breakdown of the completely different node software program implementations on the Bitcoin community. Supply: Coin Dance

Knots permits node runners to implement strict knowledge dimension limits, which proponents argue is important to protect the decentralization of the Bitcoin protocol.

The Bitcoin ledger has generated about 680 gigabytes of knowledge for the reason that inception of the decentralized protocol in 2009, due to the straightforward structure of Bitcoin and strict knowledge limits.

Bitcoin’s low knowledge storage necessities permit anybody to run a node on retail pc {hardware} for as little as $300, democratizing entry and guaranteeing most decentralization.

For comparability, higher-throughput blockchain networks and sensible contract platforms, which generate way more knowledge, can value tens of 1000’s of {dollars} to run and require specialised industrial {hardware}, that means solely rich buyers and enormous companies can run nodes and implement the consensus guidelines of these protocols.

Sturdy {hardware} necessities translate into elevated centralization of a blockchain protocol and a heightened danger that a number of nodes can collude to change the consensus guidelines or reverse transactions.

Journal: Bitcoin’s long-term safety price range downside: Impending disaster or FUD?