Close Menu
StreamLineCrypto.comStreamLineCrypto.com
  • Home
  • Crypto News
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • NFT
  • Defi
  • Blockchain
  • Metaverse
  • Regulations
  • Trading
What's Hot

Bitcoin Drops to $87K Amid Yearn’s yETH Exploit

December 1, 2025

How to Read mNAV — and Why NYDIG Says It Falls Short

November 30, 2025

Cocoon Decentralized AI Network Launches on the Open Network (TON)

November 30, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Monday, December 1 2025
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
StreamLineCrypto.comStreamLineCrypto.com
  • Home
  • Crypto News
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • NFT
  • Defi
  • Blockchain
  • Metaverse
  • Regulations
  • Trading
StreamLineCrypto.comStreamLineCrypto.com

If They Can Do it to Sun, Who’s Next?’ Say Insiders as WLFI Claims Freeze Was to ‘Protect Users’

September 6, 2025Updated:September 6, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
If They Can Do it to Sun, Who’s Next?’ Say Insiders as WLFI Claims Freeze Was to ‘Protect Users’
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
ad



If They Can Do it to Sun, Who’s Next?’ Say Insiders as WLFI Claims Freeze Was to ‘Protect Users’

World Liberty Monetary (WLFI) is defending its choice to freeze a whole bunch of wallets, together with Tron discovered Justin Solar’s, saying the transfer was meant to guard customers from phishing-related compromises, to not stifle regular buying and selling.

“WLFI solely intervenes to guard customers, by no means to silence regular exercise,” the undertaking wrote on X.

We’ve heard group issues about current pockets blacklists. Transparency first: WLFI solely intervenes to guard customers, by no means to silence regular exercise.

— WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) September 5, 2025

WLFI mentioned earlier this week that 272 wallets had been blacklisted, with roughly 215 of these linked to a phishing assault and 150 compromised by help channels.

Justin Solar’s WLFI tackle was frozen on Friday, following a number of small “dispersion take a look at” transfers between his personal wallets after claiming unlocked tokens at launch, none of which had been gross sales.

The outbound transfers from Solar-tagged wallets made it seem that the big-name WLFI investor was promoting his tokens, however onchain knowledge paints a distinct image.

In a publish on X, Nansen founder Alex Svanevik identified that Solar’s transfers did not match the timeline of WLFI’s token decline.

Nansen knowledge reveals Justin Solar transferred 50 million WLFI value about $9.2 million on Sept. 4 at 09:18 UTC — three to 5 hours after the token’s steepest drop — that means the switch adopted the crash relatively than induced it.

Onchain knowledge from Nansen reveals a $12 million WLFI switch from HTX to Binance by a third-party market maker.

The tokens had been borrowed utilizing HTX’s personal capital as a part of a routine rebalance, however the transfer got here after WLFI’s sharpest declines and was too small to have moved the market, contemplating WLFI has a each day buying and selling quantity of over $700 million.

As soon as deposited on Binance, it’s inconceivable to find out whether or not the tokens had been offered or just held.

Market contributors as an alternative level to broad shorting and dumping of WLFI by market makers and buying and selling desks throughout a number of exchanges as the true driver of the crash.

Onchain data again this view: a switch from BitGo to Flowdesk flagged by Nansen, coincided with the beginning of WLFI’s slide and has turn into a key datapoint in explaining the sell-off.

In the meantime, WLFI’s choice to freeze funds linked to the crash set off nervous chatter amongst whales, market makers, and different buying and selling desks that their tokens might be frozen by literal fiat.

“If they will do it to Solar, who’s subsequent?” is how an individual acquainted with conversations amongst massive market contributors paraphrased it when chatting with CoinDesk.

WLFI is at present buying and selling for $0.18, based on CoinGecko. It is down 40% since itemizing.





Source link

ad
claims freeze insiders protect SUN users Whos WLFI
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Related Posts

Bitcoin Drops to $87K Amid Yearn’s yETH Exploit

December 1, 2025

How to Read mNAV — and Why NYDIG Says It Falls Short

November 30, 2025

Cocoon Decentralized AI Network Launches on the Open Network (TON)

November 30, 2025

Tether CEO Rails Against S&P, Says Influencers Targeting Tether With FUD

November 30, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

ad
What's New Here!
Bitcoin Drops to $87K Amid Yearn’s yETH Exploit
December 1, 2025
How to Read mNAV — and Why NYDIG Says It Falls Short
November 30, 2025
Cocoon Decentralized AI Network Launches on the Open Network (TON)
November 30, 2025
Tether CEO Rails Against S&P, Says Influencers Targeting Tether With FUD
November 30, 2025
BlackRock Exec Says Bitcoin ETFs Becoming A Major Revenue Source Was A ‘Big Surprise’
November 30, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA
© 2025 StreamlineCrypto.com - All Rights Reserved!

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.