Timothy Morano
Feb 06, 2026 11:08
Unbiased testing of 8 AI presentation instruments reveals Manus outperforms rivals for research-backed B2B gross sales decks. Full pricing and have breakdown.
A brand new comparative evaluation of AI presentation instruments for B2B gross sales groups reveals important efficiency gaps between platforms, with research-capable instruments outscoring template-based alternate options by substantial margins.
The February 2026 analysis examined eight platforms towards actual enterprise eventualities together with quarterly enterprise opinions, aggressive decks, and consumer proposals. Manus scored highest at 9/10, adopted by Visme and Genspark at 8/10, with SlideSpeak trailing at 6/10.
The Analysis Hole Defines Winners
What separated high performers from the pack wasn’t design high quality—it was whether or not the AI might really discover and cite actual information. Most instruments merely transformed prompts into formatted slides. Solely Manus demonstrated the flexibility to course of tons of of sources in parallel earlier than producing content material.
In a warehouse robotics market panorama check, Manus produced particular figures: $17-21B market dimension by 2030, 15-18% CAGR, and regional breakdowns exhibiting Asia Pacific at 39.89% market share. That is the distinction between slides you’ll be able to defend in a procurement assembly versus generic “the market is rising quickly” filler.
Technology time displays this hole. Template instruments like Prezi and Lovely.ai produce decks in 2-5 minutes. Manus takes 5-10 minutes as a result of it is really researching earlier than constructing.
Instrument-by-Instrument Breakdown
Manus ($20/month Professional) – Greatest for enterprise offers requiring defensible statistics. Connects to Google Drive, Notion, and Slack for context. Slower however produces consulting-quality output with cited sources.
Genspark ($20-50+/month) – Strongest for structured QBRs. Constructed-in crew collaboration and logical framework for account well being opinions. Does not validate underlying information although—assumes your inputs are correct.
Visme ($12.25/month Starter) – Knowledge visualization standout. Charts look skilled and hyperlink to spreadsheets for reside updates. Weak on AI content material technology—you are writing the narrative your self.
Lovely.ai ($12/person/month annual) – Model consistency enforcer. Sensible layouts auto-format as you add content material. The AI would not write significant gross sales content material, simply constructions what you give it.
Prezi ($7-29/month) – Visible storytelling for government briefings. Polished transitions make tales simpler to comply with. Content material stays high-level with no analysis validation.
SlideSpeak ($29/month Premium) – Drafting device with iteration power. You’ll be able to refine the identical deck by way of AI prompts relatively than regenerating. Visuals are minimal and information high quality is low.
CRM Integration Stays a Hole
None of those instruments supply deep native CRM ingestion for reside Salesforce or HubSpot information. You are still exporting metrics manually and feeding them to the AI. This aligns with broader 2026 developments the place purpose-built gross sales platforms deal with CRM automation whereas presentation instruments give attention to output high quality.
Enterprise groups sometimes spend 15-Half-hour refining any AI-generated deck earlier than exterior sharing. Instruments offering construction (Genspark) and proof (Manus) see increased adoption than pure slide mills.
Finances Concerns
Free choices are restricted: Prezi presents a trial, SlideSpeak offers 3 credit (one per slide), and Manus gives 300 day by day tokens. Mid-range consumers ($10-30/month) have probably the most choices. Enterprise groups will doubtless land on Manus or Genspark Professional/Workforce plans.
The underside line for gross sales leaders: in case your decks must survive due diligence from shoppers, buyers, or procurement groups, research-capable instruments justify their longer technology instances. Should you’re producing inside drafts or brand-consistent updates, quicker template instruments work superb—simply do not ship them to clients with out human evaluate.
Picture supply: Shutterstock
