The variety of Bitcoin (BTC) nodes signaling assist for Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal 110 (BIP-110), a short lived gentle fork limiting the quantity of information included in every transaction on the consensus degree, rose to 2.38%.
583 out of 24,481 nodes are working BIP-110, and the first node software program implementation for working the gentle fork proposal is Bitcoin Knots, based on The Bitcoin Portal.
BIP-110 limits the dimensions of transaction outputs to 34 bytes and caps the OP_RETURN information restrict to 83 bytes. The non permanent gentle fork will likely be deployed for 1 12 months, with attainable extension or alteration after the 1-year time period, based on the proposal’s GitHub web page.
OP_RETURN is a script code that enables customers to embed arbitrary information and has been the topic of intense debate inside the Bitcoin neighborhood following the discharge of Bitcoin Core model 30, the most recent improve of essentially the most extensively used Bitcoin node software program.
The OP_RETURN restrict was capped at 83 bytes, which Bitcoin Core builders unilaterally eliminated in Bitcoin Core model 30, following a controversial pull request, first proposed in April 2025. The proposal was usually opposed by the Bitcoin neighborhood.
Associated: Bitcoiners reject quantum computing fears as reason behind value droop
The arbitrary information problem creates a divide inside the Bitcoin neighborhood
The Bitcoin Core replace that eliminated the info restrict went stay in October 2025, sparking a torrent of unfavourable suggestions from critics, who say that eradicating the arbitrary information restrict incentivizes spam on the Bitcoin ledger.
Arbitrary information will increase the storage prices of working a Bitcoin node, and the prohibitive price results in elevated centralization of the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin nodes might be run on consumer-grade computer systems, not like high-throughput blockchains that generate massive portions of information and require specialised {hardware}.
Rising node {hardware} necessities undermines the Bitcoin protocol’s worth proposition of being a decentralized financial community, based on critics. Bitcoin advocate and educator Matthew Kratter mentioned:
“It is like a type of parasitical vegetation, like ivy, utterly masking a tree, consuming up the tree, after which the internal scaffolding collapses, and the ivy collapses as a result of it is mainly destroyed the construction. That is what spam has the potential to do to Bitcoin.”
Others like Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin Core contributor, assist the uncapped OP_Return Restrict, arguing that filters do little to cease spam on the community.
Journal: Large questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year energy outage?
