Sir Tim Berners-Lee, pc scientist, inventor of the net and an all-round good man, wrote some phrases in The Night Customary earlier this week, arguing that polarization, conspiracy and psychological well being crises on-line stem from design flaws that have to be corrected — even when that requires regulation.
The piece attracts straight from chapter 13, “Design Points,” of his lately launched ebook “This Is for Everybody: The Unfinished Story of the World Large Internet,” which I encourage everybody to learn.
I agree with Berners-Lee’s prognosis. However regulation just isn’t the treatment. The online’s decline just isn’t merely a design failure; additionally it is an financial one. Design selections comply with incentives, and people incentives have been distorted by fiat cash and the promoting mannequin it props up. Low cost credit score from the fiat-fuelled enterprise capital system pushed Silicon Valley away from hacker-led engineering and towards surveillance-driven revenue extraction.
To repair the net, we want open supply protocols and open supply cash.
The web might be mounted with out regulation. However we can’t engineer an answer whereas ignoring the financial headwinds that form design. The financial system — quarterly shareholder primacy and fiat inflation — pressures firms to prioritize engagement, outrage and surveillance promoting. Bitcoin adjustments this equation. It removes inflationary stress, probably breaks the advert mannequin by enabling new types of monetization that align with consumer pursuits quite than exploit them. Mixed with open protocols, Bitcoin is the enabler of a freer, extra moral net.
What Went Flawed With World Large Internet
Berners-Lee highlights two principal signs: polarization and psychological well being injury. He’s proper.
1. Polarization and Collapse of Shared Actuality
Berners-Lee says:
“Essentially the most egregious symptom is polarisation. Social media, as at present constructed, leads customers to take excessive political positions and demonise the opposing facet. This makes constructive engagement tough, permits outlandish conspiracy theories to flourish, and promotes demagoguery over deliberation.”
Polarization is actual. However amplification cuts each methods. The identical algorithms that floor conspiracy theories additionally amplify truths that the mainstream media suppresses. In an age of censorship and propaganda, this amplification has typically been the one approach reality surfaces.
The deeper problem is that individuals now not share the identical actuality. A breaking story fractures into irreconcilable narratives relying on whether or not it spreads through Twitter, TikTok, Bluesky or Reddit; whether or not filtered by way of left-leaning fact-checkers or right-leaning commentators; whether or not summarized by Grok or ChatGPT. Every tribe outsources “reality formation” to its personal authorities, who’re incentivized to ship emotionally handy details. LLMs can even generate artificial personalities to disrupt discourse at scale. Regulation is not going to restore belief right here — as a result of the issue is not only what flows, however how belief is established within the first place.
That mentioned, algorithms are optimized for outrage as a result of outrage is worthwhile. Regulation is not going to change this, because it’s as a lot an financial drawback as it’s a technical one.
As Neal Howe and William Strauss describe in “The Fourth Turning,” we’re in a disaster period: Consensus frays, energy realigns and previous preparations give approach. In apply, meaning extra friction on-line — tribal feeds, narrative knife fights and rising coordination prices. In different phrases, we must always count on to see among the carnage we’re seeing immediately, and we are able to do one thing about it.
2. Psychological Well being and Addictive Algorithms
Berners-Lee says:
“Many social media customers report struggling psychological well being points after extended utilization. {The catalogue} of ills associated to social media is alarming: anxiousness, despair, jealousy, inadequacy, emotions of isolation, physique picture points.”
I agree, social media is liberating and harmful in equal measure. Search queries for anxiousness rise in parallel with utilization, and {the catalogue} of harms is lengthy: despair, inadequacy, physique picture points, isolation. That is actually one thing that wants fixing.
Berners-Lee says:
“Social media firms are utilizing machine-learning strategies to make customers hooked on their platforms. These techniques are designed to be addictive, feeding individuals increasingly more excessive content material, making them alternately indignant and unhappy.”
This isn’t unintended. Twenty-plus years in the past, Silicon Valley execs and engineers had been taught how one can design addictive techniques at BJ Fogg’s Persuasive Expertise Lab at Stanford (his ebook, for anybody , is named “Persuasive Expertise”), with some even attending retreats at his dwelling the place these concepts had been explored additional. The *Like* button, infinite scroll and crimson notification badges all got here from his teachings and had been engineered to hijack dopamine pathways.
Jack Dorsey, talking on the Oslo Freedom Discussion board in 2024, spoke in regards to the injury attributable to the algorithms designed by these firms:
“The actual debate ought to be about free will. We’re being programmed primarily based on what we are saying we’re keen on, and we’re instructed by way of these discovery mechanisms what’s attention-grabbing — and as we have interaction and work together with this content material, the algorithm continues to construct increasingly more of this bias.”
Dorsey has beforehand spoken about how Twitter started as a protocol imaginative and prescient earlier than enterprise capital steered it towards development, management and advert monetization. Having seen the corruption of that imaginative and prescient, it’s no coincidence that Dorsey now backs open supply protocols like Nostr, Bitchat and beforehand Bluesky. His investments are a affirmation that platforms can’t be reformed from inside. Solely protocols, open by design, can shield free will from algorithmic seize.
Berners-Lee has advised that algorithms could possibly be rebuilt to maximise pleasure quite than outrage. It’s a noble imaginative and prescient, one I want had been lifelike — however beneath present incentives, it’s not. Analysis exhibits that high-arousal feelings, particularly anger, unfold quicker than calm or optimistic feelings.
Makes an attempt to pivot have confirmed expensive earlier than. For example, when Fb adjusted its Information Feed in 2018 to scale back dangerous content material, customers spent 50 million fewer hours per day on the location and publishers noticed site visitors collapse. More moderen audits verify the identical sample: Platforms that downrank divisive content material see measurable drops in engagement and income. (You’ll find associated research right here, right here, right here and right here.)
So long as firms are sure by their fiduciary responsibility to maximise shareholder worth, regulators can’t pressure them to intentionally make much less cash as long as outrage stays extra worthwhile than pleasure.
Regulation of the Web
Berners-Lee has lengthy been one of many net’s strongest defenders. He fought for internet neutrality, encryption and decentralization. He warned of surveillance lengthy earlier than it was trendy. He has stood on the facet of open participation and consumer empowerment.
So it comes as considerably of a shock when Berners-Lee concedes that regulation could be crucial. He even quotes bad-faith actor Yuval Noah Harari to help this case:
“If a social media algorithm recommends to individuals a hate-filled conspiracy concept, that is the fault not of the one who produced the conspiracy concept, it’s the fault of the individuals who designed and let free the algorithm.”
Whereas I begrudgingly agree with Harari on this occasion, let’s not lose sight of who we’re coping with. He’s a World Financial Discussion board favourite, a constant advocate of technocratic options and somebody who has described bitcoin as a forex of mistrust. His worldview defaults to centralization, surveillance and state energy. His arguments are wearing cause however advance much less autonomy and extra management.
Berners-Lee admits: “Whereas I usually oppose the regulation of the net, on this occasion I agree.” I’m sorry, however regulation is a slippery slope that we must always do our utmost to keep away from.
It’s as a result of Berners-Lee has been such a defender of the web that his concession to regulation feels slightly defeatist. Has the relentless rise of algorithmic seize, misinformation and addictive design worn him down? Maybe. However regulation just isn’t the reply.
One other phrase on regulation… When governments regulate, they entrench incumbents and weaponize “security” to justify censorship. They’re additionally hopelessly incompetent — the EU’s cookie legislation is an ideal instance: It protected no one, achieved nothing and left customers coping with annoying pop-ups.
True democracy on-line ought to be crowdsourced and constructed with open protocols — guidelines with out rulers.
The Financial Headwind of a Free and Flourishing Web
Now let’s get to the crux of the matter. The most important problem is fiat cash. Its full implementation in 1971 marked a fork within the street: productiveness saved climbing, however wages stagnated in actual phrases. WTF Occurred in 1971? exhibits the divergence clearly — inequality, debt, housing prices and social decay all accelerating after Nixon severed the ultimate tie to gold.
Earlier than 1971, costs and wages remained comparatively secure. For hundreds of years, beneath laborious cash, there was equilibrium. In the course of the short-lived classical gold commonplace, the Belle Époque delivered a golden age of invention and relative prosperity. Costs stayed secure, and by most accounts, life flourished. That stability vanished as soon as fiat cash grew to become the norm.
Since then, and at an accelerating tempo, individuals have needed to work more durable for much less. Firms have been compelled to extract extra productiveness whereas turning into much less moral. Keep in mind Google’s “Don’t be evil” motto? That is doubtless the malevolent pressure that brought about Sergey, Larry and Eric to lose their innocence.
Talking of Google, its advert mannequin killed conventional media’s enterprise mannequin, leaving it depending on state subsidies and company sponsorships. Governments now use media as PR machines, which is a big a part of the polarization drawback we’re witnessing on-line.
The enterprise capital mannequin, fuelled by low-cost fiat credit score, warped Silicon Valley incentives from hacker-led engineering to surveillance-led revenue extraction. Centralization and monopolization are hallmarks of straightforward credit score and the Cantillon impact.
Jeff Sales space estimates expertise applies a pure deflationary pressure of ~5% per 12 months, whereas Saifedean Ammous argues that actual inflation — not CPI, however financial enlargement — runs nearer to 15-16%. Governments offset deflation with cash printing; firms reply by extracting extra from customers in an ever-increasing race to the underside.
The result is seen in fairness markets: the Mediocre 493 corporations listed on the S&P 500 are structurally failing, and the S&P, powered by the Magnificent 7, principally mirrors the cash provide.
And layered on prime of fiat, fiduciary responsibility and quarterly reporting locked firms right into a head-on battle with inflation. Fiduciary responsibility, codified in Nineteenth-century U.S. legislation, merely required administrators to behave in shareholders’ greatest pursuits. However the SEC’s 1970 mandate for quarterly 10-Q reporting — mixed with Milton Friedman’s 1970 essay within the New York Instances proclaiming that the only real accountability of enterprise is to extend income — hardened the tradition of “quarterly capitalism.”
| Yr | Occasion | Influence on Company Governance / Incentives |
| Nineteenth century | Fiduciary duties codified in U.S. company legislation. | CEOs and administrators should act in the most effective pursuits of shareholders. |
| 1934 | U.S. Securities Alternate Act | Gave SEC authority to require periodic reporting from public firms. |
| 1970 | SEC mandates quarterly 10-Q reporting | Begins the tradition of Wall Avenue earnings seasons, with common short-term efficiency checks. |
| 1970 | Milton Friedman publishes “The Social Duty of Enterprise is to Improve Its Earnings” (NYT). | Popularizes shareholder primacy as company objective. |
| 1971 | Nixon suspends gold convertibility — fiat period begins. | Rising inflation means firms should beat not simply development expectations, however inflationary stress too. |
| Nineteen Eighties | Wall Avenue’s leveraged buyouts + stock-based CEO pay. | Locks in short-term earnings focus: Lacking 1 / 4 turns into harmful for CEOs. |
| 2000s–current | “Quarterly capitalism” dominates. | CEOs are pressured by markets, and shareholders to hit quarterly EPS targets. |
This convergence — fiat cash, shareholder primacy, quarterly reporting and venture-funded adtech — created the proper storm. Firms are structurally incentivized to gas outrage, habit, and mine consumer information. Regulation can’t change this as long as the underlying cash system is damaged. Till we modify course and return to sound cash, design fixes will at all times fail beneath financial stress.
Tim Berners-Lee, Bitcoin is the Panacea!
Bitcoin is each a treatment for damaged cash and a basis for brand new enterprise fashions on-line. It isn’t an app or an organization — it’s a financial base layer that resets incentives on the root.
I don’t know the place Berners-Lee stands on Bitcoin particularly. Publicly, he’s dismissed crypto as a speculative on line casino. On that, I agree. Bitcoin is completely different: no insiders, no enterprise fund, no basis, no mutable guidelines. If he sees that distinction, good; if not but, perhaps quickly.
Fixing cash
Bitcoin combines the most effective properties of gold — sturdiness, shortage, uniformity, unforgeable costliness — with the most effective properties of fiat — divisibility, portability. The result’s unequivocally the most effective cash ever designed: It’s additionally borderless, censorship-resistant, decentralized, brazenly programmable, sure by thermodynamics and internet-native.
In distinction to Bitcoin, it’s turning into clearer with every passing 12 months that the fiat system is crumbling beneath our toes, as bitcoin monetizes in its shadow. Bitcoin affords a method to diffuse the worldwide debt bubble quite than let it implode, correcting the course of financial historical past by inserting world a reimbursement on a sound footing.
The implications are huge, if/when bitcoin turns into fiat’s successor. For the primary time in residing reminiscence, society would now not should swim towards the tide simply to remain nonetheless. With sound cash, the pure deflationary advantages of technological progress can accrue to all, not be siphoned away by these closest to the spigot.
Jeff Sales space, in “The Value of Tomorrow,” makes the purpose that expertise is inherently deflationary, i.e., it delivers extra for much less. However beneath fiat cash, this deflation is papered over with inflation, debt and development targets. Bitcoin harmonizes cash with expertise. Its mounted provide means the beneficial properties of technological deflation accrue to everybody, quite than being siphoned away.
Fixing incentives on-line
“When you think about the web to be the equal to a nation state, it’ll have a forex native to itself, and there may be not going to be anybody celebration or establishment that makes this occur, and there’s not going to be anybody celebration or establishment that may cease it from occurring.” – (Jack Dorsey, Quartz)
Now that we’ve got an web native forex, the query is… what can it allow?
Effectively, initially, bitcoin can reshape incentives on-line. It could do that by enabling micropayments, streaming sats and peer-to-peer monetization, which means customers can help creators straight. Platforms can earn cash with out promoting their customers’ information to advertisers. This might reduce the impact and even eliminate an ad-driven, information mining mannequin that forces platforms to optimize for outrage.
It is going to additionally upend the enterprise capital mannequin, as presently those that are closest to the cash spigot profit in higher proportion. As Bitcoin has no central financial institution to create more cash, everybody has a comparatively equal footing, and thus funding ought to change into extra decentralized, as soon as once more.
From there, completely new dynamics can emerge. Protocols and purposes received’t be beholden to growth-at-all-costs fashions dictated by enterprise funds; they’ll scale organically, funded by the very customers who depend on them. Worth turns into the metric, not quarterly development or advert impressions. Builders can ship merchandise that resolve actual issues, and be rewarded straight in sats. Communities can pool capital with out intermediaries, seeding initiatives from the underside up quite than ready for approval from the highest down.
On this surroundings, the web can lastly align with its unique ethos — open, interoperable and user-driven — as a result of the financial layer itself is open, interoperable and user-driven. Bitcoin clears the bottom for that alignment.
Bitcoin just isn’t restricted to fixing the net — it’s upstream of it. With out sound cash, design fixes will at all times be bent again towards exploitation. With sound cash, platforms can undertake fashions which are moral by default. With internet-native cash, creators might be paid straight. Bitcoin is the fulcrum the place damaged incentives give method to more healthy techniques — on-line and off.
“The web, our biggest device of emancipation, has been reworked into probably the most harmful facilitator of totalitarianism we’ve got ever seen.” – Julian Assange
Fixing this doesn’t require authorities regulation. It requires realigning incentives — with open protocols and Sound Cash.
Open Supply Options
Berners-Lee factors to open supply instruments like Polis, Mastodon and Fora as promising experiments in more healthy on-line discourse. Constructing on these efforts, a brand new wave of protocols combines the identical open ethos with a local web cash, aligning incentives in ways in which advertising-driven fashions by no means might.
With Bitcoin because the financial base, protocols can tackle the design layer. These techniques are stay, early and wish broader adoption and a killer software — however they already present how one can realign incentives with out regulation.
Mastodon demonstrates what’s doable with open supply federation and timelines constructed from individuals you select to comply with, quite than engagement-driven algorithms. And whereas its refusal to depend on promoting is a power, the absence of a local funds system is a limitation.
Enter Nostr
Launched in late 2019 by Fiatjaf, Nostr (“Notes and Different Stuff Transmitted by Relays”) is an easy protocol that decouples id and content material from any single app. Keys establish customers; relays transmit signed occasions. A number of purchasers (Damus, Amethyst, Primal, Iris, Alby) learn and write to the identical social graph, delivering actual interoperability — the form of cross-client, cross-app portability Berners-Lee requires.
Customers choose relays and form their very own feeds, placing algorithmic alternative firmly of their palms. This echoes the thought Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain proposed — and which Berners-Lee spotlights in his ebook — for fine-tuned controls to steer content material away from conspiracy rabbit holes. Not like that platform-driven imaginative and prescient, Nostr empowers customers straight, with its algorithmic flexibility restricted solely by the protocol’s younger age.
Whereas funds aren’t a part of the bottom design, Lightning “zaps” are actually widespread — native, on the spot tipping and funds tied to posts and profiles. That pairing — open communication plus open cash — allows bottom-up coordination and speedy iteration with out gatekeepers. Deletion is advisory (purchasers/relays might honor it), so there’s sensible permanence and accountability throughout the community.
Learn extra: Nostr: censorship-resistant communication
Protocols, Infused with Bitcoin
Chaumian Mints
Cashu by Calle brings Chaumian eCash to Bitcoin — non-public, bearer-style tokens that may run alongside Nostr or standalone. It allows quick, non-public micro-flows; Calle additionally co-founded BitChat with Jack Dorsey, taking these concepts right into a user-facing chat context.
Popularity Techniques
Group Notes proves cross-faction context can sluggish misinformation. Add clear weighting, DIDs and Internet-of-Belief primitives and also you get a sturdy, moveable popularity. Put sats as skin-in-the-game (bonds/slashing for dishonest alerts) and the mechanism strengthens with out central censors.
Spam Resistance
Spam isn’t new, and it isn’t purely on-line. Usenet has dealt with floods for many years as a decentralized, user-run community with no central regulator. Adam Again’s Hashcash confirmed the core precept: connect a small proof-of-work value and abuse drops. The identical economics apply now with bitcoin — sats-priced frictions through Lightning (or Ark Protocol) make bot farms and propaganda costly whereas retaining sincere participation low-cost.
Spam is principally a numbers recreation: When it’s free, it scales; add value and also you restore the sign. Assume refundable per-post/per-DM deposits, PoW stamps or fee limits priced in sats— good-faith interplay stays sustainable whereas mass manipulation turns into uneconomic.
In Conclusion
Sir Tim Berners-Lee is true in regards to the signs. Our opinions differ relating to the treatment. Regulation can’t reverse centralization engineered by states and firms; it merely entrenches governments into the issue it partly created.
The drift didn’t begin with dangerous UX. It began with damaged cash (and all the issues therein) and the top of sound cash (1971), along with shareholder-primacy dogma, bent incentives towards short-term nominal beneficial properties and surveillance promoting. From there, outrage paid the payments, whereas integrity fell by the best way.
The treatment is Bitcoin returning the world to sound cash, which is able to allow open protocols to raised energy the net.
Screw the regulators.
Repair the cash, repair the world.
