Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has criticized the Ethereum layer-2 community ZKsync as a result of it nonetheless operates like a multisig system regardless of claims of community-led governance.
In a publish on X (previously Twitter), Yakovenko argued that the identical “sincere majority” assumptions apply to ZKsync as a result of its system’s authorized or technical management might simply fall underneath the jurisdiction of a courtroom, compromising its decentralization.
In line with him:
“Sufficient of the token holders to create a quorum and sufficient of the ‘skilled safety council’ might be inside attain of a rando US chapter choose that might order all of them take all of the bridged property underneath management of a chapter belief.”
His feedback had been in response to Alex Gluchowski, co-founder and CEO of Matter Labs, the group behind ZKsync. Gluchowski had claimed the community’s new decentralized governance system was not a multisig setup and making “a important step in the direction of Stage 2.”
Stage 2 refers to a transition from keen on full decentralization. On this stage, belief is positioned completely within the blockchain’s code and algorithms, making certain the system is open, safe, and immune to manipulation.
Notably, no Ethereum layer-2 community is completely in Stage 2 of its decentralization growth.
Decentralized governance
On Sept. 12, Gluchowski introduced that ZKsync’s governance system had gone stay.
The system introduces a three-body construction, which incorporates the ZK token meeting—a bunch of token holders who delegate their voting energy to delegates. These delegates can submit and vote on protocol, token, and governance improve proposals.
In line with the group:
“That is maybe crucial aspect of the system: token holders and their Delegates can provoke unusual upgrades to the ZKsync protocol immediately onchain, as a substitute of counting on a single multisig.”
In the meantime, Delegates may even have authorized safety by means of the ZKsync Affiliation, an ownerless non-profit that addresses private legal responsibility considerations.
The second a part of the governance construction is the ZKsync Safety Council, which consists of engineers, auditors, and safety professionals. The Council has the facility to evaluation and actively approve protocol upgrades, freeze the protocol, and submit needed time-sensitive upgrades.
Nonetheless, their energy is constrained as they can not submit and approve upgrades unilaterally.
Lastly, the ZKsync Guardians guarantee governance proposals align with the ideas of the ZK Credo. They maintain veto energy and function a test on the opposite governance our bodies.
The three governance entities—the Token Meeting, Safety Council, and Guardians—collaborate to evaluation and execute proposals, corresponding to ZKsync Enhancements, Token Applications, and Governance Advisory modifications. The Token Meeting can submit proposals, which the Guardians can veto if wanted, and the Safety Council should approve protocol upgrades.
Basically, this construction prevents people or teams from having unilateral management over proposals and upgrades.
Talked about on this article
