Stablecoin issuer Circle has reportedly blacklisted a sensible contract linked to privateness protocol Zama, freezing roughly $12.6 million in consumer funds. The event, first flagged by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, includes the protocol’s Confidential USDC (cUSDC) contract deployed on Ethereum seven hours earlier than ban. The affected contract handle had been publicly documented in Zama’s docs and visual on blockchain explorers, making the freeze each traceable and verifiable in actual time.
Zama’s Frozen Funds Draw Relationship To In a single day Finance And Authorized Dispute
In response to additional findings by ZachXBT, the freeze could also be not directly tied to current controversy and authorized points surrounding the asset-management and yield-generating protocol In a single day Finance.
Knowledge reveals that pockets handle 0xf7fcc deposited roughly $12.4 million in USDC into the Zama contract on Might 11, 2026. This pockets seems to be related to In a single day Finance, which has just lately been embroiled in governance tensions. Notably, token holders had alleged a potential rug pull by the event staff. This resulted in a governance vote on the DeFi protocol to distribute its treasury property.
ZachXBT shared further data suggesting that In a single day Finance can be dealing with a civil case in court docket. One of many plaintiffs within the protocol case is Patagon Administration, a agency recognized within the DeFi area for partaking in aggressive governance methods, akin to hostile DAO takeovers/RFV raiding. Whereas no direct causal hyperlink has been confirmed between Circle actions and these occasions, the overlap between authorized proceedings, treasury actions, and the frozen funds has raised issues about how interconnected DeFi protocols can expose unrelated customers, i.e., Zama customers on this case, to exterior dangers.
Circle’s Unilateral Motion Units Undesirable Precedent
Circle’s freeze has additionally reignited criticism of transparency practices by centralized issuers. In response to ZachXBT, the Zama staff seems to have obtained no prior discover earlier than the cUSDC contract was blacklisted. If confirmed, this may amplify rising issues about unilateral enforcement actions affecting decentralized purposes and their customers with out warning.
Earlier in March 2026, Circle reportedly froze over 16 scorching wallets related to varied entities with out publicly explaining its rationale. The most recent motion, nevertheless, goes a step additional by focusing on a protocol-level contract the place consumer funds are pooled, quite than remoted wallets. This distinction is important as a result of it raises questions on custodial danger in supposedly decentralized techniques.
On the time of reporting, Circle has not issued an official clarification for its unilateral motion in freezing Zama’s cUSDC contract.
Featured picture from Shutterstock, chart from Tradingview
Editorial Course of for bitcoinist is centered on delivering totally researched, correct, and unbiased content material. We uphold strict sourcing requirements, and every web page undergoes diligent overview by our staff of high know-how specialists and seasoned editors. This course of ensures the integrity, relevance, and worth of our content material for our readers.
